the
good life's end
|
The Good
Life’s End Research is interested in what people regard
as a good life’s end. Numerous research into this field
has shown that different elements are important for a ‘good’
death. Amongst others these are a painfree death or good pain
management (of physical pain and/or emotional distress), maintaining
autonomy and control (influence on the manner, timing and place
of death), dying after a fulfilled life, surrounded by close ones,
not being a burden to family and friends, strengthening relationships
with family and friends and being spiritually prepared to die.
Of course intercultural and individual differences exist.
The Good Life’s Research mainly specializes
in the importance of the influence on the manner, timing and
place of death, one’s wish for autonomy and control at
life’s end. The research field of The Good Life’s
End Research is therefore mainly directed at the ways of self-directed
dying.
On the one hand this entails medical self-directed
dying. This is the ending of life by or under guidance of a
medical doctor. For example euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide
or terminal sedation.
On the other hand this entails non-medical self-directed dying.
This is the ending of life outside the medical domain or when
a medical doctor doesn’t have the responsibility for the
cause of dying, but the individual self. For example suicide
or self directed dying with openness toward close ones (self-euthanasia).
|
|
|